

Homonymy of words belonging to different parts of speech: the activity-based approach to studying the topic at school
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-5-27-43
Abstract
The article examines the homonymy of words of different parts of speech in the context of teaching orthography to schoolchildren. This phenomenon requires special attention because, firstly, it underlies the understanding of morphology as a branch of linguistics. Secondly, homonymy is one of the causes of spelling errors which are difficult to avoid. Thirdly, understanding the nature of this phenomenon facilitates the perception of language as a system. The paper discusses the activity-based approach to learning the Russian language. Within its framework, no ready-made rules are imposed on schoolchildren. Instead, they are given problems. Solving them contributes to the development of students’ critical thinking, as well as a deeper understanding and appropriation of independently discovered knowledge. On the one hand, the study is based on the examination of linguistic units, on the other – on the analysis of students’ activity when solving orthographic problems. Based on the experience of using the Elkonin-Davydov developmental education system, we propose a tentative structure of a lesson included in the system of lessons on the topic Homonymy of words of different parts of speech. The article also describes individual assignments which are of a research nature and contribute to the development of a few competencies that transform a schoolchild from a recipient of information into a student-researcher. The element common to these lessons is an increasingly complex algorithm for distinguishing homonyms which belong to different parts of speech and are characterised by differences in spelling. The key con[1]clusions of the study reflected in the article include a description of the activity-based approach principles in relation to the study of grammatical homonymy. Motivation built on a "success situation" and a "gap situation", the use of quasi-research techniques, reliance on an algorithm for solving problems, and step-by-step practicing of each algorithm opera[1]tion are among these principles.
About the Authors
N. V. VolodkoRussian Federation
Natalia V. Volodko, Methodologist of the Department of Methodology and Advanced Didactics, Institute of Education Content, Methods and Technology
Moscow
A. A. Saltykova
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Saltykova, Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Senior Methodologist of the Department of Methodology and Advanced Didactics, Institute of Education Content, Methods and Technology
Moscow
K. V. Yanovskaya
Russian Federation
Ksenia V. Yanovskaya, Methodologist of the Department of Methodology and Advanced Didactics, Institute of Education Content, Methods and Technology
Moscow
References
1. Aydarova L. I. Psychological problems of teaching Russian language to primary schoolchildren. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1978. 144 p. (In Russ.)
2. Davydov V. V. In The theory of developmental learning. Moscow: INTOR, 1996. 542 p. (In Russ.)
3. Kuznetsova O. V. A taxonomy of learning outcomes developed for Moscow Electronic School (a case study of individual topics in the Russian language). Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2022;83(3):25–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-3-25-33.
4. L’vov M. R., Goretsky V. G., Sosnovskaya O. V. Methods of teaching Russian language in primary school: textbook. 7th ed. Moscow: Akademiya, 2012. 464 p. (In Russ.)
5. Remorenko I. M., Yushkov A. N. Common approaches to dealing with "complex issues". Podkhody k proektirovaniyu soderzhaniya slozhnykh voprosov shkol’noi programmy: sb. statei = Approaches to designing the content of complex issues of the school program: a collection of articles. Moscow: Pero, 2023. P. 12–16. (In Russ.)
6. Repkin V. V., Nekrasova T. V. Activity-based approach in teaching the Russian language. Deyatel’nostnyi podkhod v obrazovanii: monografiya: v 3 kn. Kn. 1. Sost. V. A. L’vovsky = Activity-based approach in education: monograph: in 3 books. Book 1. Comp. by V. A. L’vovsky. V. A. L’vovsky. Moscow: Authors Club, 2018. P. 236–257. (In Russ.)
7. Saltykova A. A., Volodko N. V., Yanovskaya K. V. The main approaches to the description of planned learning outcomes in the Russian language adopted in Moscow Electronic School. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2022;83(5):7– 20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-61412022-83-5-7-20.
8. Frolova L. A. Methodological aspects of organizing orthographic activity of primary schoolchildren. Nachal’naya shkola. = Primary school. 2014;(3):28–34. (In Russ.)
9. Kharchenko S. Yu. Orthographic norm and grammatical homonymy. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2019;18(4):248–258. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2019.4.19.
10. El’konin D. B. The psychology of learning for primary school children. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2008. 325 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Volodko N.V., Saltykova A.A., Yanovskaya K.V. Homonymy of words belonging to different parts of speech: the activity-based approach to studying the topic at school. Russian language at school. 2024;85(5):27-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-5-27-43