Buy (1200 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
A model for preparing future Russian language teachers to hold a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-5-116-128
Abstract
The article considers a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic as one of the effective methods for developing not only cognitive activity and systems thinking in students, but also future Russian language teachers’ professional methodological thinking. The aim is to characterise the genre model of a heuristic conversation and describe the model for preparing future Russian language teachers to conduct a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic. The study relied on observation of the educational process of philology students’ professional and methodological training at university (at Ivanovo State University). Moreover, we used questionnaires, formative and learning experiments, analysis of the products of students’ learning and professional activities, as well as statistical processing of results (Student’s t-test). The empirical research results were processed using the SPSS 17 statistical software. The article clarifies the concept of a «heuristic conversation» in relation to the goals of Russian language teaching at school. Additionally, it characterises the genre model of such conversations and describes the algorithm for training future Russian language teachers to hold a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic. The study defined the criteria for assessing future teachers’ readiness to conduct a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic. Moreover, we described the stages of work. They include familiarising students with the heuristic conversation method; organising observation of an experienced teacher’s heuristic conversation; developing and discussing a heuristic conversation in conditions of concerted effort in creative pairs; conducting a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic at school for students in years 5–8 with a subsequent self-analysis; using this method during teaching practice at school. The paper gives assignments aimed at forming and developing skills in holding a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic. In addition, we provide examples of heuristic conversations developed by students, as well as a methodological commentary on them.
About the Authors
E. N. Komarova
Ivanovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina N. Komarova, Senior Lecturer
Ivanovo
I. A. Sotova
Ivanovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina A. Sotova, Doctor of Sciences (Pedagogy), Professor, Head of the Department of Russian Philology
Ivanovo
References
1. Baranov M. T. Types of learning material and methods of Russian language teaching. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 1981;(3):25– 31. (In Russ.)
2. Gats I. Yu. Organization of professionally oriented activity of a student-philologist. Otechestvennaya i Zarubezhnaya Pedagogika = Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy. 2018;1(6):24–38. (In Russ.)
3. Grudtsyna N. G. Pedagogical dialog in different situations in the lesson. Pedagogicheskaya ritorika: ucheb. posobie / pod red. N. A. Ippolitovoi = Pedagogical rhetoric: textbook / N. A. Ippolitova (ed.). Moscow, 2001. P. 278–300. (In Russ.)
4. Dirivyankina O. V. Formation, essence of heuristic learning in pedagogical science and practice. Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Vestnik of the Saint-Petersburg university of the MIA of Russia. 2006;(4):406–413. (In Russ.)
5. Diesterweg F. Selected pedagogical works. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1956. 374 p. (In Russ.)
6. Doliner L. I. Selection of training model in the process of building a methodical system. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izvestiya UrO RAO = Education and Science. Proceedings of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Education. 2005;(1):39–49. (In Russ.)
7. Drozdova O. E. Meta-subject teaching of the Russian language: a new stage of scientific and methodological support. Mir russkogo slova = World of the Russian Word. 2020;(3):101–104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1811-1629-2020-13101.
8. Komarova E. N. Heuristic conversation in the structure of methodological training of future Russian language teachers [Electronic resource]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic scientific journal. 2018;3(27):232–243. URL: http://vestospu.ru/archive/2018/articles/20_27_2018.pdf. (дата обращения: 28.11.2023). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32516/2303-9922.2018.27.20.
9. Komissarova L. Yu. Features of problematic dialogue technology approach during a continuous Russian language course orthography lessons. Nachal’naya shkola: plyus Do i Posle = Primary School: Plus Before and After. 2011;(11):68–72. (In Russ.)
10. Korol A. D. Dialogue in education: heuristic aspect. Moscow: Eidos; Ivanovo: Yunona, 2009. 260 p. (In Russ.)
11. Skryabina O. A. Methods and techniques of opening new knowledge at the lesson of Russian language. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2017;(5):3–7. (In Russ.)
12. Sulnichenko V. N. Use of algorithms when teaching morphological norms of nouns: a case study in the 6th grade. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2020;81(4):50–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-4-50-57.
13. Ushakov N. N. Extracurricular work on the Russian language in eight-year school: a guide for teachers. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1975. 223 p. (In Russ.)
14. Khutorskoi A. V. Didactic heuristics: Theory and technology of creative learning. Moscow: MSU Press, 2003. 416 p. (In Russ.)
15. Cherepanova L. V. Formation of linguistic competence in teaching Russian language. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 2006. 324 p. (In Russ.)
16. Shmeleva T. V. Model of the speech genre. Zhanry rechi = Speech Genres. 1997;(1):88–98. (In Russ.)
17. Choi T.-H., Walker A. D. A heuristic model for tailoring teacher development to educational reforms: Focusing on ambiguity and conflict generation. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018;74:72–84. (In Engl.) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.013.
18. Desyaeva N. D., Assuirova L. V., Krivorotova E. V. et al. The models of the reader’s cognitive dialogue with the text and their learning potential. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2020;95:219–225. (In Engl.) https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.11.03.24.
19. Hong H., Cai Q., Wang M. Exploring young children’s argumentation as a heuristic intertextual practice. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. 2024;24(2):318–358. (In Engl.) https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984211070731.
20. Schuler S., Fanta D., Rosenkraenzer F. et al. Systems thinking within the scope of education for sustainable development (ESD) – a heuristic competence model as a basis for (science) teacher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2018;42(2):192–204. (In Engl.) https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1339264.
21. Solov’eva S. A. Formation of key competencies: heuristic conversation. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences: IFTE 2019 – 5th International Forum on Teacher Education / R. Valeeva (ed.). 2020:78:69–75. (In Engl.) https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.01.10.
Review
For citations:
Komarova E.N., Sotova I.A. A model for preparing future Russian language teachers to hold a heuristic conversation on a linguistic topic. Russian language at school. 2024;85(5):116-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-5-116-128
Views:
253
Email this article 