Philological analysis of a literary text as science and art in Academician N. M. Shansky’s works
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-6-35-43
Abstract
The article characterises the conception of philological analysis of a literary text which was substantiated and developed in Academician N. M. Shansky’s works. The goal is to show the connection between this conception and the spiritual origins of philology as well as the traditions of Russian philological science. The research highlights the decisive role of the scientist’s ideas in the formation and development of the philological analysis of a literary text as science and art in Russian linguistics, literary criticism, and didactics. Additionally, the paper provides an extensive list of the academician’s writings focusing on the addressed problem.
Keywords
N. M. Shansky,
philological text analysis,
slow reading,
linguistic miniatures,
reflective word,
alexia
Supporting agencies: I express my gratitude to Tatyana Alexandrovna Bobrova for the opportunity to familiarise myself with N. M. Shansky’s complete bibliography on the philological analysis of a literary text as well as the scientist’s early works.
About the Author
B. G. BobylevRussian Federation
Boris G. Bobylev, Doctor of Science (Pedagogy), Candidate of Science (Philology), Honorary Worker of Higher Professional Education of the Russian Federation, Hierodeacon Nathanael, Master of Theology
Novosil
References
1. Averintsev S. S. The rhythm as а theodicy. Novy Mir = A new world. 2001;2:203–205. (In Russ.)
2. Belova N. A. Philological analysis of a literary text: implementation of the integration of linguistic and literary approaches at school: a textbook. Saransk: Ogarev Mordovia State University, 2008. 205 p. (In Russ.)
3. Bobylev B. G. Idea of philological analysis of the artistic text in the works of Nikolai M. Shansky and contemporary didactics. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika = National and Foreign Pedagogy. 2017;6(45):117–128. (In Russ.)
4. Bobylev B. G. "I do not ask God for happiness": a philological analysis of M. Yu. Lermontov’s poem "Valerik". Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2021;82(6):44–54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131614120218264454.
5. Bobylev B. G. Philological analysis of a literary text: a hermeneutical approach. Orel: Orel State University named after I. S. Turgenev, 2012. 278 p. (In Russ.)
6. Bukaty E. M., Golyshkin L. A., Karpova E. V. et al. The book about the "Book": a philological analysis of a literary text: a collective monograph. Novosibirsk: NSTU, 2014. 104 p. (In Russ.)
7. Vinokur G. O. Criticism of a poetic text. Moscow: Russian State Academy of Arts, 1927. 133 p. (In Russ.)
8. Lukin V. A. Literary text: foundations of linguistic theory: an analytical minimum. Moscow: Os’89, 2005. 559 p. (In Russ.)
9. Nikolina N. A. Philological analysis of the text: a textbook for students of pedagogical universities. Moscow: Publishing Center "Academy", 2008. 272 p. (In Russ.)
10. Shansky N. M. Linguistic detectives. Word and its secrets: Book 2. Moscow: Eksmo, 2021. 336 p. (In Russ.)
11. Shansky N. M. Linguistic analysis of literary text. Materialy Tret’ego mezhdunarodnogo metodicheskogo seminara prepodavatelei russkogo yazyka stran sotsializma = Proceedings of the 3rd International Methodological Seminar for Teachers of the Russian Language in the Socialistic Countries, June, 1960. Moscow: MSU Publ., 1962. 250 p. (In Russ.)
12. Shansky N. M. Linguistic analysis of a literary text: a textbook for students of pedagogical universities (2nd ed., revised). Leningrad: Education, 1990. 416 p. (In Russ.)
13. Shansky N. M. On the language and style of A. P. Chekhov’s stories. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 1954;4:9–15. (In Russ.)
14. Shansky N. M. Through the pages of "Eugene Onegin": Commentary. Elective. Academic Olympics. Moscow: Drofa, 2005. 176 p. (In Russ.)
15. Shansky N. M. "Pine" M. Y. Lermontov. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 1979;1:37–40. (In Russ.)
16. Shansky N. M. Literary text under a linguistic microscope: a book for home reading for students 8–10th grade. Moscow: Education, 1986. 160 p. (In Russ.)
17. Shansky N. M. Literary text under a linguistic microscope: "Terrible judgment" and "terrible judge"? What a "disgrace"? Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 1971;3:97–100. (In Russ.)
18. Shansky N. M., Makhmudov Sh. A. Collection of exercises on the linguistic analysis of a literary text: a textbook for students of ped. universities. SaintPeterburg: Education, 1992. 192 p. (In Russ.)
19. Shansky N. M., Makhmudov Sh. A. Philological analysis of a literary text: a teacher’s guide. Moscow: Russian word, 2010. 255 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bobylev B.G. Philological analysis of a literary text as science and art in Academician N. M. Shansky’s works. Russian language at school. 2022;83(6):35-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-6-35-43
Views:
687
Email this article 