Methodological linguoconceptology: resetting in the era of metamodernism
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-4-7-16
Abstract
The paper considers the relevant methodological solutions provided by methodological linguoconceptology within the theoretical framework of a new cultural paradigm, namely metamodernism, and in the conditions of the digital transformation of education. These conditions include adjusting the content of school language education with the aid of the international transdisciplinary construct of "big ideas"; using the philosophical-pedagogical category "self-concern" as an interdisciplinary category in the applied discourse of methodological linguoconceptology; mastering the conceptual sphere of the Russian language. It is concluded that the formation of national-cultural identity, patriotic and civic self-awareness of the metamodernism generation requires a new content and methodologically adjusted (i. e. adaptive) anthropological practices.
About the Author
N. L. Mishatina
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia L. Mishatina, Doctor of Sciences (Pedagogy), Professor, Department of Educational Technologies in Philology
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Gasinets M. V., Avdeenko N. A., Mikhailova A. M., Fedorov O. D., Pashchenko T. V. Big ideas for curriculum design. Moscow: HSE, 2020. 60 p. (In Russ.)
2. Gadamer H.-G. Truth and Method. The Basics of the Philosophical Hermeneutics. Moscow: Progress, 1988. 704 p. (In Russ.)
3. Galaktionova T. G., Kazakova E. I. «New literacy» as the content of adult education. Podgotovka uchitelya russkogo yazyka i literatury v sisteme vuzovskogo obrazovaniya: problemy i perspektivy. Sb. nauchn. statei; pod red. T. G. Galaktionovoy, E. I. Kazakovoy = Training a teacher of the Russian language and literature in the system of higher education: problems and prospects. Collection of scientific articles. Ed. by T. G. Galaktionova, E. I. Kazakova. Moscow: RAE, Center of Russian Language and Slavistics, 2017. P. 10–13. (In Russ.)
4. Guseltseva M. S. Metamodernism in psychology: New methodological strategies and changes of subjectivity. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2018;8(4):327–340. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.402.
5. Dumitrescu A. E. What is metamodernism and why bother? Meditations on metamodernism as a period term and as a mode. Trans. by M. Baranova, A. Zubov, M. Elistratova [Electronic resourse]. URL: https://newochem.ru/kultura/chtotakoe-metamodernizm-i-zachem-nam-eto-znat/ (accessed: 10.01.2022) (In Russ.)
6. Vermeulen T., van den Akker R. Notes on metamodernism [Electronic resourse]. URL: https:// metamodernizm.ru/notes-on-metamodernism (accessed: 10.01.2022) (In Russ.)
7. Karasik V. I., Slyshkin G. G. Modern discourse developmental trends. Aktualnye problemi filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki = Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021;1:14–31 (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2021-1-14-31.
8. Karasik V. I. Introduction. Media reality transformation. Person and his discourse–6: Digitalisation of communicative practicies: Collective monograph. Ed. by M. R. Zheltukhina. Moscow, Volgograd: PrinTerra-Design, 2020. 384 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kolesnikova I. A. Post-pedagogical syndrome of the digimodernism age. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019;28(8– 9):67–82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-8-9-67-82.
10. Lotman Yu. M. Inside the thinking worlds. Human – text – semioshere – history. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture, 1996. 464 p. (In Russ.)
11. Mishatina N. L. Shaping a competent reader in the dialogue of science and art: A case study of joint projects by subject teachers. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2021;201:77–89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2021-201-77-89.
12. Morin E. Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Sinergeticheskaya paradigma: sinergetika obrazovaniya: kollektivnaya monografiya = Synergetic paradigm: synergy of education. Collective work. Ed. by V. G. Budanov. Moscow, Progress-Tradition, 2007. P. 24–96. (In Russ.)
13. Frumkina R. M. Self-awareness of linguistics yesterday and tomorrow. Izvestiya akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka = News of the Academy of Sciences. Literature and Language Series. 1999;58(4):28–38. (In Russ.)
14. Epstein M. N. From knowledge to creativity: How the humanities can change the world. Moscow, S.-Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives, 2016, 480 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mishatina N.L. Methodological linguoconceptology: resetting in the era of metamodernism. Russian language at school. 2022;83(4):7-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-4-7-16
Views:
594
Email this article 