On the types of analysis of literary text in Russian language lessons
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2021-82-2-7-15
Abstract
This article aims to investigate and characterise types of literary text analysis in Russian language lessons by reviewing the scientific and practical experience accumulated in the methodology of teaching the Russian language and literature at school. The first type of analysis is a combination of assignments aimed at both understanding the content of a literary work as an art phenomenon and identifying its structural features, which actualizes the methodological principles of school literature teaching. This model also includes linguistic-stylistic assignments covering various levels of the language system. Such an analysis can be called complex. The second type involves focused analysis organized within the framework of working with a linguistic concept. The main purpose of students in this case is to identify meanings, i.e., substitutes for the lexical meaning of a concept word. The types of analysis described in this article can be used to help students understand the literary text in its semantic integrity.
About the Author
M. I. ShutanRussian Federation
Mstislav I. Shutan, Dr. of Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Literature and Cultural Studies
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Bakhtin M. M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Bocharov S. G., Bernshtein G. S., Deryugina L. V., Averintseva S. S., Bocharova S. G. (ed.). Art publ., Moscow, 1979. 424 p. (In Russ.).
2. Vinogradov V. V. About the theory of artistic speech: textbook allowance. Higher school publ., Moscow, 1971. 240 p. (In Russ.).
3. Gejmbuh E. Yu. Poems in prose by I. S. Turgenev: «Inner» chronotope as cycle-organized characteristics. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2018. Vol. 79, No. 9. P. 37–41. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2018-79-9-37-41. (In Russ.).
4. Golovin B. N. Fundamentals of the theory of modern Russian syntax: textbook allowance. Nizhny Novgorod University publ., N. Novgorod, 1994. 170 p. (In Russ.).
5. Deikina A. D. Priority directions in the methodology of teaching the Russian language. Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo pedagogicheskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki: sbornik statei = Scientific works of the Moscow Pedagogical State University. Psychological and pedagogical sciences: collection of articles. Prometheus publ., Moscow, 2007. P. 119–129. (In Russ.).
6. Levushkina O. N. The concept of axiological textocentrism in A. D. Deikina’s works. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2019. Vol. 80, No. 1. P. 10–15. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2019-80-1-10-15. (In Russ.).
7. Lotman Yu. M. Analysis of poetic text: The structure of the verse: a guide for students. Education publ., Leningrad, 1972. 271 p. (In Russ.).
8. Mishatina N. L. Methodological linguoconceptology and anthropological practices of the 21st century. Devoted to the 20th anniversary of the field. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2020. Vol. 81, No. 4. P. 7–15. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-4-7-15. (In Russ.).
9. Pahnova T. M. Texts about and by M. M. Prishvin at Russian Language lessons. Russkii yazyk v shkole =Russian language at school. 2018. Vol. 79, No. 2. P. 27–31. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2018-79-2-27-31. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shutan M.I. On the types of analysis of literary text in Russian language lessons. Russian language at school. 2021;82(2):7-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2021-82-2-7-15