Preview

Russian language at school

Advanced search

«The Mysterious Singer»: A Classroom Discussion of A. S. Pushkin’s Poem «Arion»

https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-4-34-41

Abstract

The paper presents a detailed school linguistic and literary analysis of A. Pushkin’s poem Arion. The purpose of the study is to theoretically justify and describe the methodology for conducting an in-depth discussion of this poem in the classroom, including highlighting the key stages of the discussion, as well as providing questions and tasks on the text. In the course of the study, methods of linguistic and literary analysis, theoretical generalization, and project planning were used. From the perspective of the psychodidactic approach, the main stages of the discussion of the poem Arion by A. Pushkin with students are highlighted; questions and tasks are formulated aimed at developing schoolchildren’s understanding of this work, increasing the reader’s perception, enhancing the research attention and cognitive interest, and forming a thoughtful attitude towards the lyric text. Three semantic plans of the poem Arion are considered, distinguished by the degree of explicitness and semantic  content: explicitly-implicit, implicit and contextual (background). Different points of view regarding the possible political context of this work are presented, the role of the mythological context is analysed; the features of the compositional structure, which is built on the «climax – resolution» principle, are revealed. The author concludes that, in order to develop an understanding of lyrics among adolescents, it is necessary to conduct a detailed analytical and synthesizing work with a poem and to build a conversation lesson based on the creative interaction of students with both the lyric composition and other readers, which involves taking into account the possibilities of different readings of the text and respect for the other opinions, which can be used as a springboard for students’ empathy and understanding.

About the Author

K. V. Mironova
Psychological Institute, Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation

Master of Psychology, Researcher

9/4 Mokhovaya str., Moscow, 125009, Russia



References

1. Bakhtin M. M. Questions of literature and aesthetics. Moscow, 1975. (In Rus.)

2. Gasparov M. L. Entertaining Greece: stories about the ancient Greek culture. Moscow, 2000. (In Rus.)

3. Gasparov M. L., Podgaetskaya I. Yu. «My sister is life» by Boris Pasternak. The revise of understanding. Moscow, 2008. (In Rus.)

4. Glebov G. S. About «Arion» // Pushkin: Temporary of the Pushkin commission / USSR Academy of Sciences. Institute of literature. Moscow, Leningrad, 1941. Issue 6, рp. 296–304. (In Rus.)

5. Granik G. G., Bondarenko S. M., Kontsevaya L. A. How to teach to work with a book. Moscow, 1995. (In Rus.)

6. Kak uchit’ russkomu yazyku i literature sovremennykh shkol’nikov? Shkol’nyi uchebnik segodnya: kollektivnaya monografiya [How to teach the Russian language and literature to modern schoolchildren? School textbook today: collective monograph]. Eds. G. G. Granik, N. A. Borisenko. Moscow, St. Petersburg, 2018. (In Rus.)

7. Lebedeva V. P. Psychological and didactic aspects of personality-value education. In Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal [Kazan Pedagogical Journal]. 2006, No. 1, pp. 17–25. (In Rus.)

8. Mironova K. V. Evaluation of the level of adolescents’ lyric poetry comprehension. In sikhologicheskiye issledovaniya: vyp. 9 [Psychological Studies: issue 9]. Eds. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko, N. E. Kharlamenkova. Moscow, 2018, pp. 87–98. (In Rus.)

9. Nemirovskii I. V. Decembrist or servist? (The biographical context of the poem «Arion»)]. In Legendy i mify o Pushkine [Legends and myths about Pushkin]. Saint-Petersburg, 1995, pp. 174–191. (In Rus.)

10. Panov V. I. Psychodidactics of educational systems: Theory and practice. Petersburg, 2007. (In Rus.)

11. Rubinshtein S. L. On understanding. In Rubinstein S. L. Problems of general psychology. Moscow, 1973, pp. 236–237. (In Rus.)

12. Smirnov A. A. Problems of the psychology of memory. Moscow, 1966. (In Rus.)

13. Soboleva O. V. «Person who understands»: novice reader formation. Kursk, 2009. (In Rus.)

14. Mironova K. The principle of open individuality as a basis for teenagers’ creative interaction with lyric poems. In Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2019, No. 12(4), рр. 130–142. DOI:10.11621/pir.2019.0408.

15. Pike M. Keen readers: adolescents and pre-twentieth century poetry. In Educational Review. 2000, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 13–28. DOI:10.1080/00131910097379.

16. Smith M. W. & Connolly W. The effects of interpretive authority on classroom discussions of poetry: Lessons from one teacher. In Communication Education. 2005, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 271–288. DOI: 10.1080/03634520500442145.


Review

For citations:


Mironova K.V. «The Mysterious Singer»: A Classroom Discussion of A. S. Pushkin’s Poem «Arion». Russian language at school. 2020;81(4):34-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-4-34-41

Views: 780


ISSN 0131-6141 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0966 (Online)