Methodological Linguoconceptology and Anthropological Practices of the 21st Century (Devoted to the 20th Anniversary of the Field)
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-4-7-15
Abstract
This jubilee article analyses the current state of methodological linguoconceptology through the prism of publications in the Russian Language at School journal (2000–2020). The scientific status of methodological linguoconceptology is considered from the perspective of an evidence-based methodology. The content of the basic ideas of a linguo-concept-centric approach is revealed: philologization, intellectualization and metadisciplinarity of school linguistic education. Two fundamental principles of methodological linguoconceptology focused on personality development were identified: the metadisciplinary principle of the breadth and intellectual integrity of knowledge about the world and the principle of the acquisition depth of the Russian language and culture conceptosphere. The main trends are identified and the prospects for the development of a new field of scientific and methodological knowledge are forecasted.
About the Author
N. L. Mishatina
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Ped.), Professor, Department of Educational Technologies in Philology
48 Moika river embankment, Saint-Petersburg, 191186, Russia
References
1. Vorkachev S. G. Review of the book Anthropological linguistic methodology: in search of meaning, content and evaluation. Mishatina N. L. (ed), Tsybul’ko I. P. In Mir russkogo slova [The world of Russian word]. 2016, No. 1, pp. 7, 12, 44, 61. (In Rus.)
2. Vorkachyov S. G. Imago verbi: The first effort of semantic portraiture of the name: monograph. Krasnodar, 2017. (In Rus.)
3. Karasik V. I., Dmitrieva O. A. Linguocultural type: the definition of the term. In Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: Lingvokul’turnye tipazhi: sb. nauch. tr. [Axiological linguistics: Linguistic and cultural types: collected papers]. Volgograd, 2005, pp. 5–25. (In Rus.)
4. Methodological linguoconceptology: Results and future development: monograph. Ed. N. L. Mishatina. Saint-Petersburg, 2017. (In Rus.)
5. Mishatina N. L. Virtual cultural conceptuary «Soul Dominant» and its methodological potential. In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2016, No. 7, pp. 3–7. (In Rus.)
6. Mishatina N. L. Methodological linguoconceptology in the space of modern Russian studies. In Metodicheskaya lingvokontseptologiya: itogi i perspektivy razvitiya: monografiya [Methodological linguoconceptology: Results and future development: monograph]. Ed. N. L. Mishatina. – Saint-Petersburg, 2017, pp. 49–67. (In Rus.)
7. Mishatina N. L. About inventory of terminological apparatus of methodological linguoconceptology. In Metodicheskaya lingvokontseptologiya: itogi i perspektivy razvitiya: monografiya [Methodological linguoconceptology: Results and future development: monograph]. Ed. N. L. Mishatina. – Saint-Petersburg, 2017, pp. 67–80. (In Rus.)
8. Mishatina N. L. Educational concept dictionary in the light of New Encyclopedism. In Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania [Perspectives of Science and Education]. 2019, No. 41 (5), pp. 47–62. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2019.5.4. (In Rus.)
9. Mishatina N. L., Verbitskaya M. G. Мethodological linguoconceptology: aiming at metadisciplinarity (On the example of the concept of «home»). In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2019, No. 3, pp. 3–10. DOI:10.30515/0131-6141-2019-80-3-3-10. (In Rus.)
10. Mishatina N. L., Sorokina Yu. A. Use of methodological linguoconceptology in developing emotional intellect. In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2019, vol. 80, No. 6, pp. 7–15. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2019-80-6-7-15. (In Rus.)
11. Morin E. Seven complex lessons in education for the future. In Sinergeticheskaya paradigma: sinergetika obrazovaniya [Synergetic paradigm: education synergetics]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 24–96. (In Rus.)
12. Prokhorov Yu. E. In search of the concept. Moscow, 2008. (In Rus.)
13. Stepanov Yu. S. Concepts. A thin film of civilization. Moscow, 2007. (In Rus.)
14. Hattie J. Visible learning. Synthesis of the results of more than 50,000 studies covering more than 86 million students. Ed. V. K. Zagvozdkin, E. A. Khamraeva (translated from the English by N. V. Selivanova). Moscow, 2017. (In Rus.)
15. SherstobitovaI.A.,MishatinaN. L.Global concept: natural science and philology (The case of «movement» («motion») and «inertia» («persistence») concepts). In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2018, No. 5, pp. 14–18. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2018-79-5-14-18. (In Rus.)
16. ShutanM. I.On the principles of working with concepts during Russian language and literature lessons.
17. In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2020, vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 7–14. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-1-7-14. (In Rus.)
18. Epshtejn M. N. From knowledge to creativity. How humanities can change the world. Moscow; Saint-Petersburg, 2016. (In Rus.)
Review
For citations:
Mishatina N.L. Methodological Linguoconceptology and Anthropological Practices of the 21st Century (Devoted to the 20th Anniversary of the Field). Russian language at school. 2020;81(4):7-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-4-7-15
Views:
852
Email this article 