Preview

Russian language at school

Advanced search

Communicative and Applied Technologies in the Training of a Professional Philologist

https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-2-88-94

Abstract

The article is devoted to the current university system of training professional philologists. The author analyzes the requirements of the Federal state educational standard of higher education in the field of philology. The communicative component is identified as the core professional competency. The leading role of communicative competency in the implementation of the basic requirements of interactive learning technologies in higher education is discussed. The requirements for the selection of disciplines in the structure of «regional university» curricula, which ensure the employability of graduates in regions, are described. In addition, the issues of testing the general (normative) literacy of a philology student, media literacy and media education of modern professional philologists, as well as their knowledge in the field of genre studies and textology are considered. The author relies on documentary sources, reviews of didactic sources and materials of students’ independent work in real and virtual environments. Various practical exercises with different text types are proposed. In describing didactic materials, their use and approaches to their analysis, the author adheres to the principles of evaluating effective methodological support that have been developed in the research laboratory and practice of university rhetoric founded by prof. T. A. Ladyzhenskaya.

About the Author

L. G. Antonova
Yaroslavl Demidov State University
Russian Federation

Lyubov G. Antonova, Dr. of Sci. (Ped.), Professor, Department of Theory and Practice of Communication

14 Sovetskaya str., Yaroslavl, 150003, Russia



References

1. Antonova L. G. Media texts in modern mass communication. In Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin]. 2010, vol. 1 (Humanities), No 3, pp. 250–255. (In Rus.)

2. Antonova L. G., Zimina L. Innovative models of working with text in class with philology students. In Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin]. 2018, No 6(105), pp. 98–107. (In Rus.)

3. Ippolitova N. A. Organization of extracurricular work of students in the process of studying pedagogical rhetoric. In Ippolitova N. A. (ed.), Scientific School prof. T. A Ladyzhenskaya: collective monograph. Issue 3. Moscow, 2015. (In Rus.)

4. Kirillova N. B. Media culture: from modern to postmodern. Moscow, 2005. (In Rus.)

5. Krongauz M. A. Russian language on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Moscow, 2008. (In Rus.)

6. Turkova K., Krasukhin K. Language import substitution: Is it possible to remove oops and wow from the language? [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.pravmir.ru/nichego-chudovishhnogo-s-yazyikom-seychas-ne-proishodit (accessed: 15.11.2019). (In Rus.)

7. Federal State Educational Standard for Higher Education in the direction of training 45.03.01 Philology (undergraduate level). [Electronic resource]. URL: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvob/450301_Filologia.pdf (accessed: 10.12.2019). (In Rus.)

8. Fedorov A. V. Media education: yesterday and today. Moscow, 2009. (In Rus.)


Review

For citations:


Antonova L.G. Communicative and Applied Technologies in the Training of a Professional Philologist. Russian language at school. 2020;81(2):88-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-2-88-94

Views: 709


ISSN 0131-6141 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0966 (Online)