Preview

Russian language at school

Advanced search

Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Debate as a Learning Tool

https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-2-21-26

Abstract

This article discusses an urgent educational problem, i.e. a sharp decrease in the level of students’ spoken language and, in particular, the lack of willingness and ability among school students to engage in a constructive dialogue when participating in debates. It is no accident that modern federal state educational standards pay special attention to the formation of students’ communicative competence at all levels of education. The aim of this article was to investigate the current situation in the field in order to obtain primary data showing at which educational levels the techniques of debate and discussion are used; to analyse the verbal behaviour of participants implementing various communicative strategies and tactics during debates. The following research methods were used: an analysis of literature in the field of psychology, pedagogy, communication and methodology; a questionnaire survey and interviews; an analysis of the oral presentations of students; generalization of pedagogical experience. The results of the interviews and questionnaire survey conducted among first-year university show that about 60% of the respondents experience difficulties in constructing argumentative speech. Discussions in schools are held only in high school. Secondary school teachers lack the competencies of organizing and conducting debates in class. The development of communicative skills of defending one’s point of view and conducting informed debates using communicative tactics based on the principles of dialogue and politeness should be taught during teenage years. It is at this age that communicative competencies are most actively formed. Specific examples of including debates in the curriculum of the Russian language (5th grade) for developing primary discussion skills are presented.

About the Author

Z. I. Kurtseva
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Russian Federation

Zoya I. Kurtseva, Dr. of Sci. (Ped.), Professor, Department of Rhetoric and Speech Culture, Institute of Philology

1/1 M. Pirogovskaya str., Moscow, 119435, Russia



References

1. Vygotsky L. S. Pedagogical psychology. Davydov V. V. (ed.). Moscow, 1991. (In Rus.)

2. Zakharova T. V., Kazakova T. V., Kolesnikova T. А. Study of the development of communicative competence in a young adolescent age in conditions of implementation FGOS NOO. In Nauchnoe obozrenie. Pedagogicheskie nauki [Scientific Review. Pedagogical sciences]. 2017, No 6–1, pp. 51–59 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://science-pedagogy.ru/ru/article/view?id=1696. (accessed: 16.12.2019). (In Rus.)

3. Issers O. S. Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. 3nd ed. Moscow, 2003. (In Rus.)

4. Kurtseva Z. I. Speech act: rhetorical and methodological aspects. In Kurtseva Z. I. (ed.), Moscow State Pedagogical University. Moscow, MSPU Publ., 2017, 280 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://elib. mpgu.info/view.php?fDocumentId=8986 (accessed: 12.09.2019). (In Rus.)

5. Ladyzhenskaya T. A. Oral speech as a means and subject of instruction: a textbook for students. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1998. (In Rus.)

6. Makhnovskaya N. I. The system of teaching argumentative skills in the course of rhetoric in higher and secondary schools. In Research materials: in 2 vol. Moscow, 2004, vol. 1. (In Rus.)

7. Sedov K. F. Discourse as suggestion: irrational influence in interpersonal communication. Moscow, 2011. (In Rus.)


Review

For citations:


Kurtseva Z.I. Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Debate as a Learning Tool. Russian language at school. 2020;81(2):21-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-2-21-26

Views: 1084


ISSN 0131-6141 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0966 (Online)