On the Сontinuity between the School Subjects «School Rhetoric» and «Russian Language as a Mother Tongue»
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-2-7-12
Abstract
This research was aimed at justifying the continuity between the course «Russian language as a mother tongue» and the course «School rhetoric», as well as to actualize the semantical and methodological aspects of school rhetoric, which can serve as a pillar in the teaching of a new subject. The primary research method was a comparative analysis of the curricula «Russian language as a mother tongue» and «School rhetoric». It is shown that, despite differences in the curriculum, these subjects share the function of supporting the main course of the Russian language. Although both relying on the linguistic competence of students formed by the course «Russian language», these courses have their own goals and objectives, as well as the content and teaching methods. It is concluded that the goals of the «Russian language as a mother tongue» course are largely consistent with those of «School rhetoric», including the pedagogical objective of forming students’ respectful attitude towards their mother tongue and native culture; developing students’ civic and patriotic qualities; improving communication skills and speech technique of students; the formation of meta-subject competencies.The content of the «Russian language as a mother tongue» and «School rhetoric» courses overlap in covering the following topics: orthology, speech etiquette, the concept of a communicative situation, language activities, genres of oral and written speech, text as a unit of communication, netiquette, etc. The potential of the rhetoric method in organizing the learning activities aimed at the formation of students’ communicative competence are demonstrated on the example of the topic «Scientific and academic styles. Report, presentation» covered in Year 9 of the «Russian language as a mother tongue» course. The general conclusion is that teachers can use the experience of teaching rhetoric at school when implementing a new course «Russian language as a mother tongue».
About the Authors
E. L. ErokhinaRussian Federation
Elena L. Erokhina, Dr. of Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Rhetoric and Culture of speech, Institute of Philology
1/1 M. Pirogovskaya str., Moscow, 119435, Russia
O. Yu. Knyazeva
Russian Federation
Olga Yu. Knyazeva, Cand. of Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Rhetoric and Speech Culture, Institute of Philology
1/1 M. Pirogovskaya str., Moscow, 119435, Russia
References
1. Barkhin K. B. Thunderstorm and night ... and other works. Moscow, 2004. (In Rus.)
2. Erokhina E. L. The rhetorical aspect of scientific speech. In Obshchaya ritorika: uchebnoe posobie [General rhetoric: study guide] / ed. N. A. Ippolitova, E. L. Erokhina. Moscow, 2012, pp. 354–356. (In Rus.)
3. Erokhina E. L. The formation of the culture of public speech of schoolchildren: a genre approach. In Sovremennoe professional’noe obrazovanie: problemy, prognozy, resheniya. Sbornik dokladov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. [Modern vocational education: problems, forecasts, solutions. Collection of reports of the international scientific-practical conference]. Kazan, 2016, pp. 53–56. (In Rus.)
4. Ippolitova N. A. The role of rhetoric in solving the problems of modern education. In Ippolitova N. A. (ed.), Metodika prepodavaniya ritoriki: uchebnoe posobie [Methods of teaching rhetoric: a training manual]. Moscow, 2014. (In Rus.)
5. Ippolitova N. A., Erokhina E. L. The principle of politeness and speech etiquette. In Russkii yazyk v shkole i doma [Russian language at school and at home]. 2018, No. 9, pp. 11–13. (In Rus.)
6. Kurtseva Z. I. Speech act: rhetorical and methodological aspects. Moscow, 2017. (In Rus.)
7. Ladyzhenskaya T. A. The system of work for the development of coherent oral speech of students. Moscow, 1975. (In Rus.)
8. Lebedev S. A. Philosophy of science: a brief encyclopedia (main directions, concepts, categories). Moscow, 2008. (In Rus.)
9. Savova M. R. The culture of speech as culture of speech activity. In Science and School. 2009, No 2, pp. 38–40. (In Rus.)
10. Salnikova O. A. What is rhetorization? In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2012, No. 3, pp. 3– 8. (In Rus.)
Review
For citations:
Erokhina E.L., Knyazeva O.Yu. On the Сontinuity between the School Subjects «School Rhetoric» and «Russian Language as a Mother Tongue». Russian language at school. 2020;81(2):7-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-2-7-12