From the History of Teaching Spelling at School: Method of «Сacography» in the Methodological Heritage of P. M. Perevlessky
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-1-45-52
Abstract
In this article, the author refers to the methodological heritage of a Russian philologist of the 19th century P. M. Perevlessky. In his book «Practical orthography with preliminary comments» (1842), P. M. Perevlessky proposed a “proofreading exercises” (carefully checking a text for errors) as practice techniques for learning orthography for schoolchildren. He emphasized the close relationship between spelling and grammar. After the publication of his book, the term «cacography» was introduced into scientific parlance, which is also used in modern methodology of teaching the Russian language. The author notes that there are still supporters and opponents of “proofreading practice”.
About the Author
N. V. Kornilov
Vladimir State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay V. Kornilov, Cand. of Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Department of Journalism, Advertising and Public Relations
87 Gorky str., Vladimir, 600000, Russia
References
1. Aleksandrov N. M. The problem of secondary pasts of the sentence in Russian. In Scientific notes of the Leningrad State Pedagogical Institute named after A. I. Herzen. Leningrad, 1963, vol. 236, pp. 3–391. (In Rus.)
2. Bondarenko M. A. Petr Mironovich Perevlessky – scientist and teacher (on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of his birth). In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2015, No. 4, pp. 31–37. (In Rus.)
3. Bulakhov M. G. East Slavic linguists: a bio-bibliographic dictionary. Minsk, 1976. vol. I, pp. 183–184. (In Rus.)
4. Buslaev F. I. (review) Practical spelling of P. Perevlesskogo, senior teacher of the Yaroslavl gymnasium. Moscow, 1842, 235 pp. In The practical syntax of a complex sentence and versification, its own. Moscow, 1842, at 12 d., 236 pp. / Moskvityanin. 1842, part V, No. 9, pp. 178–202. (In Rus.)
5. In search of a better future. In Rodnoi yazyk v shkole [Mother tongue at school]. 1914, No. 1, pp. 1–4. (In Rus.)
6. Vinogradov V. V. From the history of the study of Russian syntax (from Lomonosov to Potebni and Fortunatov). Moscow, 1958. (In Rus.)
7. Vishnepol’skaya A. G. Proofreading as a spelling learning technique. In Voprosy Psychologii [Psychology Issues]. 1960, No. 5, pp. 93–102. (In Rus.)
8. Vishnyakova L. G. On the application of the proofreading method in spelling training. In Voprosy Psychologii [Psychology Issues]. 1973, No. 5, pp. 97–103. (In Rus.)
9. Koreshkova T. V. Acceptance of cacography: possibilities and conditions of use. In Nachal’naya shkola [Elementary school]. 2000, No. 6, pp. 38–43. (In Rus.)
10. Perevlessky P. M. Practical spelling with preliminary comments, compiled by Peter Perevlessky, senior teacher of the Yaroslavl gymnasium. Moscow, 1842. (In Rus.)
11. Priemysheva M. N. Methodological heritage of Perevlessky P. M. In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2006, No. 4, pp. 44–50. (In Rus.)
12. Rozental’ D.Eh., Telenkova M. A. Handbook of the Russian language. In Dictionary of linguistic terms. Moscow, 2003. (In Rus.)
13. Tomson A. I. General jurisprudence. Odessa, 1910. (In Rus.)
14. Ushakov M. V. To the question of the so-called «cacography». In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 1947, No. 1, pp. 55–57. (In Rus.)
15. Ushinsky K. D. Native word: 3rd year; A Guide to Teaching on the «Native Word». In Ushinsky K. D. Collected works. Moscow, Leningrad, 1949, vol. 7. (In Rus.)
16. Shcherba L. V. Language system and speech activity. Moscow, 2004. (In Rus.)
Review
For citations:
Kornilov N.V. From the History of Teaching Spelling at School: Method of «Сacography» in the Methodological Heritage of P. M. Perevlessky. Russian language at school. 2020;81(1):45-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-1-45-52
Views:
1052
Email this article 