The unit "Semi-complex and Semi-compound Sentences" in the university course in Russian syntax

The unit of modern Russian language courses focused on semi-complex and semi-compound sentences is one of the most difficult compared to other topics. In the widely known current textbooks on syntax, this unit is usually not accompanied by a preamble that would highlight the grammatical phenomenon essence or the principles for classifying constructions related to elementary structure "complicators". Meanwhile, the very status of semi-complex and semi-compound sentences on the gradience scale from simple to composite sentence patterns remains controversial. The article aims to clarify problem areas and provide theoretical and methodological grounds that could serve as the linguo-didactic basis for a university course in the syntax of such sentences. The methodological framework of the study includes general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, observation). Moreover, the research employs procedures common to the humanities in order to describe and interpret individual phenomena, as well as modeling educational situations. The study resulted in a characterisation of the major features inherent in semi-complex and semi-compound sentences, regardless of the construction type complicating it. The hierarchical (multi-tier) formal grammatical structure, the increasing complexity of actant-predicate relations of such sentences, their "polypropositional" semantic structure and the "polyrhematic" communicative organisation caused by "additional" predicativity arising in them are associated with the formation of special, independent of word properties, two-tiered syntactic connections and relations. Rhythmic-melodic prominence with constructional optionality is the most essential feature of a complicator. Therefore, homogeneous part series duplicating the positions already present in the linear chain of the word forms which are members of the predicative centre are not complicating constructions. The same can be said about event names in the role of the main parts or secondary elements extending them. The combination of the enumerated properties leads to the conclusion that there is a close unity, rather than the usually declared heterogeneity of phenomena categorised as complicators. This article offers methodological recommendations for a university course in Russian syntax (the unit "Semi-complex and Semi-compound Sentences").

1. Bogdanov P. D. Isolated members of a sentence in modern Russian. Ordzhonikidze: North Ossetian University, 1977. 227 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bogoroditsky V. A. General course of Russian grammar (from university lectures). 5th ed., rev. Moscow; Leningrad: State social and economic publishing house (Sotsekgiz), 1935. 356 p. (In Russ.)

3. Buslaev F. I. Historical grammar of the Russian language. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1959. 624 p. (In Russ.)

4. Vinogradov V. V. Main aspects of sentence syntax. Vinogradov V. V. Issledovaniya po russkoi grammatike: izbr. trudy = Studies in Russian grammar: selected works. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. P. 254–294. (In Russ.)

5. Vinogradov V. V. Russian language (Grammatical theory of words): textbook. 3rd ed., rev. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1986. 640 p. (In Russ.)

6. Vostokov A. Kh. Russian grammar by Alexander Vostokov, based on his Abridged grammar, presented in a more complete form. 12th ed. Saint Petersburg: D. F. Fedorov, 1874. 216 p. (In Russ.)

7. Grech N. I. Practical Russian grammar, published by Nikolai Grech. Saint Petersburg: V Tipografii Imperatorskogo Sanktpeterburgskogo vospitatel’nogo doma, 1827. 579 p. (In Russ.)

8. Davydov I. I. An experience in comparative grammar of the Russian language, published by the Second Department of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. Saint Petersburg: tip. Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk, 1852. 462 p. (In Russ.)

9. Dmitrieva L. K. On the problem of the basic syntactic unit. Teoreticheskie problemy sintaksisa sovremennykh indoevropeiskikh yazykov: sb. st. = Theoretical problems of the syntax of modern Indo-European languages: collection of articles. Leningrad: [s. n.], 1975. P. 82–84. (In Russ.)

10. Dmitrieva L. K. Address and introductory component: lectures. Leningrad: Herzen State Pedagogical University Press, 1976. 48 p. (In Russ.)

11. Dmitrieva L. K. Semi­complex sentenc es in their convergence with complex sentences on the transition scale. Slozhnoe predlozhenie v sisteme drugikh sintaksicheskikh kategorii: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. LGPI im. A. I. Gertsena. = Complex sentences in the system of other syntactic categories: interuniversity collection of scientific works of the Herzen State Pedagogical University. Leningrad: LSPI, 1984. P. 30–37. (In Russ.)

12. Dmitrieva L. K. Complex sentences (Functions of homogeneity, isolation, introduction and reference). Funkcional’nyi analiz grammaticheskikh kategorii: sb. nauch. tr. LGPI im. A. I. Gertsena = Functional analysis of grammatical categories: coll. of scientific works LGPI named after A. I. Herzen. Leningrad: LSPI, 1973. P. 153–191. (In Russ.)

13. Zolotova G. A., Onipenko N. K., Sidorova M. Yu. Communicative grammar of the Russian language. Moscow: [s. n.], 2004. 544 p. (In Russ.)

14. Ilyenko S. G. Communicative and stylistic repertoire of participial phrases in Pushkin’s "Eugene Onegin" in view of Vinogradov’s concept of the author’s image. Lingvisticheskie aspekty pushkinovedeniya: Izbrannye stat’i = Linguistic aspects of Pushkin studies: selected articles. Saint Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical University Press, 2008. P. 46–63. (In Russ.)

15. Kamynina A. A. On semi­predicative constructions in a simple sentences. Moscow: Moscow State University Press, 1974. 52 p. (In Russ.)

16. Kozhevnikova N. A. Enumeration constructions. Poeticheskaya grammatika. T. I. = Poetic grammar. Vol. I. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2005. P. 298–327. (In Russ.)

17. Kormilitsyna M. A. Semantically complicxed (polypropositional) simple sentences in spoken language. Saratov: Saratov State University Press, 1978. 151 p. (In Russ.)

18. Krotevich E. V. On the connections of introductory words in phrases and sentences. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 1958;(6):16–25. (In Russ.)

19. Krylova O. A. Communicative syntax of the Russian language. 2nd ed., rev. and expanded. Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2009. 176 p. (In Russ.)

20. Lomov A. M. Typology of Russian sentence. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Press, 1994. 280 p. (In Russ.)

21. Manaenko G. N. Information­discursive approach to the analysis of complex sentences: monograph. Stavropol: Stavropol State University Press, 2006. 263 p. (In Russ.)

22. Manaenko G. N. Semi­complex senten ces in language and speech: essays on theory and research methodology: monograph. Stavropol: Stavropol State University Press, 2003. 255 p. (In Russ.)

23. Mukhin A. M. The structure of sentences and their models. Leningrad: Nauka, 1968. 230 p. (In Russ.)

24. Ostanin A. I. On the concepts of complexity and semi­complex sentences (Raising the question). Voprosy teorii i istorii russkogo yazyka: sb. statei = Issues in the theory and history of the Russian language: collection of articles. Saratov: Saratov State University, 1976. P. 55–58. (In Russ.)

25. Patroeva N. V. Complex sentences and their functions in poetic speech (based on the poems and verses by E. A. Baratynsky). Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University Press, 1999. 272 p. (In Russ.)

26. Patroeva N. V. Poetic text: the category of complexity. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University Press, 2002. 334 p. (In Russ.)

27. Peshkovsky A. M. Russian syntax in scientific coverage. 7th ed. Moscow: Gosuchpedgiz, 1956. 512 p. (In Russ.)

28. Potebnya A. A. From notes on Russian grammar. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1958. Vols. 1–2. P. 109– 110. (In Russ.)

29. Rudnev A. G. Syntax of semi­complex sentences. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1959. 198 p. (In Russ.)

30. Sannikov V. Z. Russian syntax in the semantic­pragmatic space. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2008. 624 p. (In Russ.)

31. Sedun E. P. The structure of introductory and inserted words. Uchenye zapiski Dnepropetrovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Scientific notes of the Dnepropetrovsk state university. 1958;(68):124– 133. (In Russ.)

32. Solganik G. Ya. Essays on modal syntax: monograph. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2010. 136 p. (In Russ.)

33. Studneva A. I. On the connection between introductory sentences and the main part of a statement. Uchenye zapiski Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta = Scientific notes of the Ryazan state pedagogical institute. 1968. Vol. 51. P. 304–310. (In Russ.)

34. Studneva A. I. The connection between inserted clauses and the main structure of the statement. Soderzhanie i metodika prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka v srednei i vysshei shkole: materialy XV nauch.-metod. konf. yazykovedov Povolzhya = Content and methods of teaching Russian in secondary and higher schools: Proceedings of the XV Scientific and Methodological conf. of linguists of the Volga region. Volgograd: Volgograd State Ped. In­te, 1972. P. 72–75. (In Russ.)

35. Khatiashvili L. G. On the question of introductory clauses in modern Russian. Trudy Tbilisskogo gos. un-ta = Proceedings of Tbilisi State University. 1956. Vol. 63. P. 383–396. (In Russ.)

36. Chuglov V. I. Complication of a simple sentence: identification, incorporation, parcellation: monograph. Vologda: Publishing Department of Vologda State University, 2017. 155 p. (In Russ.)

37. Chuglov V. I. Semi­complex sentences in modern Russian: semi­predicative and explanatory constructions (in the structural and semantic terms). Vologda: Publishing Center of the Vologda Institute for Educational Development, 2011. 237 p. (In Russ.)

38. Shakhmatov A. A. Syntax of the Russian language. Moscow: FLINTA: Nauka, 2014. 720 p. (In Russ.)