

The school of thought of St. Petersburg methodological linguoconceptology: experience in problematising a continuing professional development course
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-1-16-27
Abstract
Continuing professional development is considered as a form of lifelong learning. The paper describes the experience of problematising the interdisciplinary professional development course "Linguoconceptology: methods and techniques for working with concepts". The main aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of the new scientific field on the student’s motivation for academic and scientific work in the professional development process, as well as on its effectiveness expressed in the desire to use the methods and techniques of methodological linguoconceptology in researchand practical activity. The main research methods were system and problem analysis when making the problem statement in conjunction with the content analysis and questionnaire methods. The study reveals the mechanism of interaction between three resources, namely scientific (an invitation to comprehend new ideas and concepts of modern science), methodological (which is particularised in authorial techniques and anthropopractices), and students’ motivated activity as a marker of their effective completion of the course syllabus. The motivational activity resource was involved in two assignment types, i. e. testing and solving practice-oriented problems. We performed content analysis of the course participants’ products. The paper presents the results of studying the trainees’ motivated activity. The most important principle for the professional development system is the immediate application of what has been learnt.
About the Authors
N. L. MishatinaRussian Federation
Natalia L. Mishatina, Doctor of Sciences (Pedagogy), Professor
Saint Petersburg
Yu. V. Malkova
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Malkova, Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor
Saint Petersburg
I. A. Sherstobitova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Sherstobitova, Candidate of Sciences (Pedagogy), Associate Professor
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Bagge M. B., Fedorov S. V. Concept as a means to understand the idea of a literary work in a literature lesson. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of modern pedagogical education. 2019;63(4):11–14. (In Russ.)
2. Vershlovsky S. G., Matyushkina M. D. Questionnaire survey in sociopedagogical research: text book. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Academy of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education, 2005. 101 p. (In Russ.)
3. Vorkachev S. G. Foreword. N. L. Mishatina. Metodicheskaya lingvokontseptologiya: novye idei i antropopraktiki = Methodological linguoconceptology: New ideas and anthropopractices. Saint Petersburg: Book house, 2022. P. 9–11. (In Russ.)
4. Vorkachev S. G. Russian linguocultural conceptology: Current state, problems, and development vector. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka = The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language . 2011;70(5):64– 74. (In Russ.)
5. Lebedeva N. V. Adult learning on retraining and professional development courses: Principles and conditions. Nauchnyi dialog = Scientific Dialogue . 2013;(4):63–73. (In Russ.)
6. Leontiev A. N. Problems of development of the psyche. 4th ed. Moscow: MSU Press, 1981. 584 p. (In Russ.)
7. Malkova Yu. A. Work with aphorisms at school (a system of analytic, creative and project tasks). Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school . 2021;82(5):37–47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2021-82-5-37-47.
8. Mishatina N. L. School genre studies: In search of anthropopractices of «creative assemblage of the self». N. L. Mishatina, I. P. Tsybulko. Antropologicheskaya lingvometodika: v poiskakh smysla, soderzhaniya i otsenivaniya. Pod red. N. L. Mishatinoi = Anthropological linguomethodology: In search of meaning, content and evaluation. Ed. by N. L. Mishatina. Moscow: National education, 2016. P. 152–162. (In Russ.)
9. Mishatina N. L. Instead of a conclusion. The invisible college, or what should be the scientific form of self organization of the 21st century methodology. N. L. Mishatina. Metodicheskaya lingvokontseptologiya: Itogi i perspektivy razvitiya = Metho dological linguoconceptology: Results and prospects of development . Saint Petersburg: Book house, 2017. P. 417–425. (In Russ.)
10. Frumin I. D., Dobryakova M. S., Barannikov K. A., Remorenko I. M. Universal competencies and new literacy: What to teach today for success tomorrow. Preliminary findings of an international report on trends in school transformation. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2018. 28 p. (In Russ.)
11. Sherstobitova I. А. Concept analysis on literature lessons: The text emotiogenicity of the prose poem «To the Memory of U. P. Vrevsky» by I. S. Turgenev. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school . 2021;82(4):7–20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2021-82-4-7-20.
Review
For citations:
Mishatina N.L., Malkova Yu.V., Sherstobitova I.A. The school of thought of St. Petersburg methodological linguoconceptology: experience in problematising a continuing professional development course. Russian language at school. 2024;85(1):16-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-1-16-27