

Verbal painting as a way of overcoming fragmentary perception
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-1-7-15
Abstract
In our rapidly changing world, young people inevitably face the negative impact of technological progress on the development of mental processes. Thus, the issue of overcoming digital natives’ fragmentary perception is an urgent objective of modern science. The author aims to present the results of studying verbal painting as a means to develop the perception integrity of art works and speech utterances in the context of the 21st century challenges. Research methods included scientific and methodological literature analysis; modelling the verbal drawing teaching process; generalization of language and literature teachers’ experience, including the author’s own experience; generalisation of the results of pedagogical experiments; an analysis of written works by students in years 5 to 7. As a result, the study has identified the principles for preparing schoolchildren for verbal painting in Russian language and literature lessons. They are as follows: concentration on ideas, specification and detailing of ideas, imagination boosting, emotional involvement, subjective modality. The paper also provides examples of exercises and assignments for implementing these principles. In order to demonstrate their effectiveness, samples of students’ works are analysed. Conclusions. The principles of preparation for verbal painting that the article formulates contribute to the integrity of the perception of the world around us and help overcome its fragmentary nature. After such instruction, schoolchildren acquire the ability to create complete verbal pictures accompanied by details and expressive elements.
About the Author
L. A. MosunovaRussian Federation
Lyudmila A. Mosunova, Doctor of Sciences (Psychology), Associate Professor, Professor
Kirov
References
1. Aleksandrov V. Ya. From a notebook. Nauka i zhizn’ = Science and life. 1968;(7):123. (In Russ.)
2. Bruner J. Psychology of cognition: Beyond the immediate information. Trans. by K. I. Babitsky; foreword and general ed. by A. R. Luria. Moscow: Progress, 1977. 412 p. (In Russ.)
3. Buldakova Yu. V., Diner E. V. The text of readers’ comments on works of literature as a source of studying the national cultural code. Tekst. Kniga. Knigoizdanie = Text. Book. Publishing . 2022;(30):95–112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/23062061/30/6.
4. Vygotsky L. S. Imagination and creativity in childhood: Psychological sketch: teacher’s guide. 3rd ed. Moscow: Education, 1991. 93 p. (In Russ.)
5. Mosunova L. A. Reduction of the reader’s im agination in a multimedia environment. Vestnik Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts. 2021;(4)42:109–119. (In Russ.)
6. Mosunova L. A. Risks of digitalization in education. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty = Scientific and technical information. Series 1: Organization and methodology of information work . 2020;(7):14–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36535/05480019-2020-07-2.
7. Mosunova L. A. Drawing word pictures as a way of semantic reading of the art text. Literatura v shkole = Literature at school . 2007;(3):28–31. (In Russ.)
8. Chernigovskaya T. V. Cheshire smile of Schr ödinger’s cat: Language and consciousness. 2nd ed. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture, 2016. 447 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mosunova L.A. Verbal painting as a way of overcoming fragmentary perception. Russian language at school. 2024;85(1):7-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-1-7-15