The psycho-pedagogical conditions for the formation of students’ professional and communicative competence in the course of teaching speech-oriented disciplines (from the author’s teaching experience)
https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-1-78-86
Abstract
The article asserts the necessity to create psychological and pedagogical conditions aimed at forming professional and communicative competence of university students in the process of teaching speech-oriented disciplines. Such conditions include understanding the professional ideal as a personal, inner motivation for learning; the use of the communicative-cognitive approach; the focus on the step-by-step personality formation of a communicative personality. To identify the above-mentioned conditions, the author employed the following research methods and techniques: structured observation of students’ speech, group and individual interviews with learners, psychosemantic approach, self-characterisation and self-presentation methods, socio-pedagogical investigation. The best practices aimed at a gradual formation of a communicative personality and learners’ professional ideal are described through the analysis of studying speech genres, the orthographic and pronunciation (orthoepic) norms of the Russian language.
About the Author
N. V. Chernikova
Michurinsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Chernikova, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor
Michurinsk
References
1. Vinogradov V. V. On the culture of Russian speech. Kultura russkoi rechi: ucheb. dlya vuzov = Culture of Russian speech: textbook for universities / L. K. Graudina, E. N. Shiryaeva (eds.). Moscow: INFRA-M, 2009. P. 342–348. (In Russ.)
2. Gavrilov V. V. Using active teaching methods in the process of university students’ communicative competence development (within the subject "The Russian language and speech culture"). Pedagogicheskii zhurnal Bashkortostana = Pedagogical journal of Bashkortostan. 2020;1:127–137. (In Russ.)
3. Evtushenko O. A. Communicative personality in modern administrative discourse. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva = Bulletin of the Volga University named after V. N. Tatishchev. 2016;2(4):73–80. (In Russ.)
4. Ippolitova N. A., Smelkova Z. S., Ladyzhenskaya T. A. Rhetoric. Moscow: Prospect, 2020. 448 p. (In Russ.)
5. Isaeva N. A. Strategies for Solving Methodological Problems in Russian Higher Philological Education (Based on A. D. Deykina’s Ideas). Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2019; 1:96–100. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.30515 / 01316141-2019-80-1-96-100.
6. Mishina I. I. Evaluation of Speech Self-presentation Skills. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russianlanguage at school. 2018;2:69–73. (In Russ.) http://doi. org/10.30515 / 0131-6141-2018-79-2-69-73.
7. Morozova T. V., Luzanov A. A. The grammatical word as a socially necessary quality of the future engineer. Evrazijskoe nauchnoe ob"edinenie =Eurasian Scientific Association. 2019;10–5(56:404–406. (In Russ.)
8. Prokhorenko L. V. Ensuring person’s self-revelation speech genres. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2018;2:63–68. (In Russ.) http:// doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2018-79-2-63-68.
9. Raspopova T. A. About teaching disciplines "Pedagogical rhetoric". Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2015;5:3–78. (In Russ.)
10. Senchenkova E. V. Use of cluster method studying the subject "Russian language and culture of speech" in university. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2018;4:68–72. (In Russ.) http:// doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2018-79-4-68-72.
11. Sidorova N. I. Cultural speech characteristics of a linguistic personality of a lawyer, economist, psychologist. Filologicheskie i pedagogicheskie aspekty gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya v neyazykovyh vuzah FSIN Rossii: sb. materialov mezhregionalnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem = Philological and pedagogical aspects of humanitarian education in non-linguistic universities of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia: a collection of materials of an interregional scientific-practical seminar with international participation. Ryazan: Academy of Law and Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service publ., 2017. P. 200–207. (In Russ.)
12. Sternin I. A. Basics of speech impact. Moscow; Berlin: Direct-Media, 2015. 289 p. (In Russ.)
13. Khodyakova L. A., Ramazanov R. K. New achievements in the formation of professional competencies of foreign students of philology. Russkii yazyk v shkole = Russian language at school. 2017;5:78–82. (In Russ.)
14. Chebotareva E. Yu. Communicative personality of minority culture representatives in intercultural situations. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological research. 2015;8(39):7. (In Russ.)
15. ChuikinaL. A.,AldynazarovaR. M. The standard of speech as a component of vocational training of the future engineer. Lingua mobilis. 2012;1(34):62– 66. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chernikova N.V. The psycho-pedagogical conditions for the formation of students’ professional and communicative competence in the course of teaching speech-oriented disciplines (from the author’s teaching experience). Russian language at school. 2022;83(1):78-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-1-78-86
Views:
428
Email this article 