Preview

Russian language at school

Advanced search

Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, Inclusion: a Literature Review in the Research Field

https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-3-31-45

Abstract

The history of the appearance and development of the concepts of dyslexia, dysgraphia and inclusion is considered in the article. The research methods are the method of critical interpretation, the method of conceptualization, the observational method. The terms of dyslexia and dysgraphia attracted the doctor’s attention in the Late 19th – Early 20th Century. An explanation of their causes focused on medical aspects (ophthalmological factors, brain asymmetry, etc.). Linguistic and social argumentations of these deviations have appeared in the 1970s. The number of students with difficulties in reading and writing in the world is quite large and amounts to at least 10% of the total world population. In the 1980–1990s, the question arose of the stages of the such student’s integration in the general educational process. The three pedagogical models were used in were used in education throughout the 20th century: segregation, integration and inclusion. Although the inclusion assumes the equal participation of all children, without exception, in the educational process, nevertheless there is no consensus on the widespread of this model in education among the students’ parents and pedagogical community.

About the Author

A. V. Zelenin
University Tampere
Finland

Doc. of Sci. (Philol.), lector of Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampereen yliopisto,

Tampere



References

1. Zelenin A. V. «Digitalization destroys school walls»: the experience of school digitalization in Finland. In Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2019, No. 6, pp. 16–22. (In Rus)

2. The conceptual and terminological dictionary of a speech therapist. Ed. Seliverstova V. I. Moscow, 2015 [Slovar’ logopeda]. (In Rus.)

3. Ainscow M., Booth T., Dyson D. Improving schools, developing inclusion. London, 2006.

4. Biklen D. Social constructions of inclusion: learning in practice. In Inkluusion haaste koululle: oikeus yhdessä oppimiseen [The Challenge of inclusion to schools. The right to learn together].

5. Murto P., Naukkarinen A., Saloviita T. (Eds.). Jyväskylä, 2001. (In Finn.)

6. Björn P. Job description for special education teachers in the future. In Lasten erityishuolto ja -opetus Suomessa [Special care and education for children]. Ed. M. Jahnukainen. Tampere, 2012. (In Finn.)

7. Booth T., Ainscow M. Index for inclusion developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies in Inclusive Education (CSIE) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.eenet.org.uk/resources/docs/Index%20English.pdf (accessed: 09.10.2019).

8. Bowers P. N., Kirby J. R., Deacon S. H. The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. In Review of Educational Research. 2010, No. 80, pp. 144–179.

9. Breadmore H. L., Deacon S. H. Morphological processing before and during spelling. In Scientific Studies of Reading. 2019, No. 23(2) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1499745 (accessed: 01.11.2019).

10. Caravolas M. The nature and causes of dyslexia in different languages. In The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Eds. M. J. Snowling, C. Hulme. Oxford, 2005.

11. The international dyslexia association: dyslexia basics [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.interdys.org/ewebeditpro5/upload/DyslexiaBasicsREVMay2012.pd (accessed: 17.09.2019) [Dyslexia Basics].

12. Egelund N., Haug P., Persson B.A Scandinavian perspective on inclusive education. Stockholm, 2006. (In Swed.)

13. Elwer S., Keenan J. M., Olson R. K., Byrne B., Samuelsson S. Longitudinal stability and predictors of poor oral comprehenders and poor decoders. In Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2013, No. 115, pp. 497–516 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23528975 (accessed: 25.09.2019).

14. Evans P. Including students with disabilities in mainstreaming schools. In Meeting special and diverse educational needs: Making inclusive education a reality. H. Savolainen, H. Kokkala, & H. Alasuutari (Eds.). Helsinki, 2000, pp. 31–39.

15. Fischbein S., Österberg O. A school for all children. Special pedagogical perspective on meeting children. Helsinki, 2009. (In Finn.)

16. Fletcher J. M., Shaywitz S. E., Shaywitz B. A. Comorbidity of learning and attention disorders: Separate but equal. In Pediatric Clinics of North America. 1999, No. 46 (5), pp. 885–897.

17. Gayán Guardiola J. The evolution of research on dyslexia [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ibgwww.colorado.edu/~gayan/ch1.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2019).

18. Critchley M. Developmental dyslexia: Its history, nature and prospects. In Reading, Perception and Language: Papers from the World Congress on Dyslexia. Eds. Duane D. D. and Rawson M. B. Baltimore, 1975.

19. Göransson K., Nilholm C., Karlsson K. Inclusive education in Sweden? A critical analysis. In International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011, No. 15 (5), pp. 541–555.

20. Haug P. Educational dilemma: Special education. Häftad bok Stockholm, 1998. (In Swed.)

21. Hinshaw S. P. Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. In Psychological Bulletin. 1992, No. 111 (1), pp. 127–155.

22. Jokinen L. DYSLEKSIA – As a part of adult student’s daily life. Helsinki, 2009. (In Finn.)

23. Jylhä I. Guidance and teaching skills: difference between didactic and pedagogy. In Erilainen oppija – yhteiseen kouluun [А different kind of learner to a common school]. Eds. Ikonen O., Virtanen P. Jyväskylä, 2007. (In Finn.)

24. Kauliņa А., Zīriņa T. Creative teaching methods for developing reading literacy in a teaching process. In Ad verba līberorum: Linguistics & Pedagogy & Psychology. 2010, No. 2 (1), pp. 92–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10196-011-0021-2.

25. Kavale K. Mainstreaming: the genesis of an idea. In The Exceptional Child. 1979, No. 26 (1), pp. 3–21.

26. Korhonen T. Difficulties in reading and writing. In Oppimisvaikeudet: Neuropsykologinen näkökulma [Learning Disabilities: A Neuropsychological Perspective]. Ed. Lyytinen H. & al. Helsinki, 1995. (In Finn.)

27. Lakkala S. Inclusive Teaching. Action research in teacher education. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 151. Rovaniemi, 2008. (In Finn.)

28. Lauriala A. Changes in research paradigms and their impact on teachers and teacher education: a Finnish case. In From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: the evolution of a research community. Craig C. J., Meijer P. C., Broeckmans J. (Eds.).

29. Bingley, 2013. Leinonen S. Reading difficulties in adulthood. In Asiakkaana erilainen oppija [A special learner as a client]. Ed. K. Strandén. Helsinki, 1998. (In Finn.)

30. Linnakylä P., Malin A., Taube K. Factors behind low reading literacy achievement. In Scandinavian Journal of Education Research. 2004, No. 48 (3), pp. 231–250.

31. Lyytinen H., Ahonen T., Eklund K., Guttorm T., Kulju P., Laakso M.-L., Leiwo M., Leppänen P., Lyytinen P., Poikkeus A.-M., Richardson U., Torppa M., Viholainen H. Early development of children at familial risk for dyslexia. Follow-up from birth to school age. In Dyslexia. 2004, No. 10 (3), pp. 146– 178.

32. Lyytinen H., Ahonen T., Leiwo M., Lyytinen P. A longitudinal study of Finnish children with reading disabilities from birth to school age. In Psykologia [Psykologia]. 2011, No. 46 (02–03). (In Finn.)

33. Metsala J. L., Whalley A. C. Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Word recognition in beginning literacy. Metsala J. L., Ehri L. C. (Eds.). Mahwah, NJ, 1998.

34. Miles R. T. and Miles E. Dyslexia a hundred years on. 2nd ed. Buckingham, 1999.

35. Moberg S. Acceptance of anomaly and social distance of deviants. Publications of the National Research and Experimental Unit 25. Helsinki, 1984. (In Finn.)

36. Moberg S. Inclusive education from teachers’ perspective. In Inkluusion haaste koululle: oikeus yhdessä oppimiseen [The challenge of inclusion for schools: The right for collaborate learning]. Eds. Murto P., Naukkarinen A., Saloviita T. Helsinki, 2001. (In Finn.)

37. Morgan W. P. A case of congenital word blindness. In British Medical Journal. 1896, No. 7 (2), pp. 1378–1389.

38. Naukkarinen A., Ladonlahti T. Commitment, flexible resources and collaboration as tools for common schools. In Inkluusion haaste koululle: oikeus yhdessä oppimiseen [The challenge of inclusion for schools: The right for collaborate learning]. Eds. Murto P., Naukkarinen A., Saloviita T. Helsinki, 2001. (In Finn).

39. Nation K., Snowling M. J., Clarke P. J. Dissecting the relationship between language skills and learning to read: Semantic and phonological contributions to new vocabulary learning in children with poor reading comprehension. In Advances in Speech-Language Pathology. 2007, No. 9, pp. 131–139.

40. Pacton S., Deacon S. H. The timing and mechanisms of children’s use of morphological information in spelling: A review of evidence from English and French. In Cognitive Development. 2008, No. 23, pp. 339–359 [Electronic resource]. URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev. 2007.09.004 (accessed: 10.11.2019).

41. Paulesu E., Demonet J. F., Fazio F., McCrory E., Chanoine V., Brunswick N., Cappa S. F., Cossu G., Habib M., Frith C. D., Frith U. Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity. In Science. 2001, No. 291, pp. 2165–2187. DOI: 10.1126/science.1057179.

42. Poussu-Olli H.-S. Developmental dyslexia: Relationships of background factors in development of reading and writing disorders. In Helsingin yliopiston fonetiikan laitoksen julkaisuja 38, syyskuu [Publications of the Department of Phonetics, University of Helsinki 38, September]. Helsinki, 1993. (In Finn.) Puolimatka T. Ubringing and Philosophy. Helsinki, 1996. (In Finn.)

43. Ricketts J., Davies R., Masterson J., Stuart M., Duff F. J. Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English. In Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2016, No. 150, pp. 330–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.013.

44. Sage D. D. Administrative strategies for achieving inclusive schooling. In Inclusion. A Guide for Educators. Baltimore, 1997.

45. Saloviita T. Special education and inclusion. In Kasvatus [Upbringing]. 2006, No. 37 (4), pp. 326– 342. (In Finn.)

46. Saloviita T. Inclusive i.e. “eligibility for inclusion”: the 13 foundations against inclusion. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://users.jyu.fi/~saloviit/tutkimus/inclusion.html (accessed: 22.10.2019). (In Finn.)

47. Shakespeare T. Disability rights and wrongs. London & New York, 2006.

48. Schenker K. Are University Studies available for everyone? Malmö, 2005. (In Swed.)

49. Sikes P., Lawson H., Parker M. Voices on: Teachers and teaching assistants talk about inclusion. In International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2007, No. 11 (3), pp. 355–370.

50. Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU). 2001. Nya villkor för lärandet i den högre utbildningen [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/sou-2001-1-d1_GPB31d1 (accessed: 15.09.2019) [SOU]. Classification of diseases ICD-10. 2 ed. Helsinki, 1999 [Stakes]. (In Finn.)

51. Stein D. S., Blum N. J., Barbaresi W. J. Developmental and behavioral disorders through the life Span. In Pediatrics. 2011, No. 128, pp. 364–373.

52. Söder M. The physical and functional integration of special schools. Uppsala, 1978. (In Swed.)

53. Takala M. Developing reading comprehension through strategy teaching. In Lukivaikeudesta lukitaitoon [From reading difficulty to reading skills]. Eds. M. Takala & E. Kontu. Helsinki, 2006. (In Finn.)

54. Takala M. Inclusion, integration and segregation. In Erityispedagogiikka ja kouluikä [Special education and school age]. Ed. Takala M. Helsinki, 2010. (In Finn.)

55. Thambirajah M. S. Developmental dyslexia: an overview. In Advances in psychiatric treatment. 2010, vol. 16, pp. 299–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/ apt.bp.108.006072.

56. Tikkanen A. Adult learning difficulties, education and career. Pro gradu-thesis of psychology. Jyväskylä, 2005. (In Finn.)

57. Tūbele S. Dyslexia or Reading Disorders. Rīga, 2008. (In Latv.)

58. Vehmas S. Special Education and Ethics. In Erityispedagogiikan perusteet [The Fundamentals of Special Education]. Eds. Moberg S., Hautamäki J., Kivirauma J., Lahtinen U., Savolainen H., Vehmas S. Helsinki, 2009. (In Finn.)

59. Vellutino F. R., Fletcher J. M., Snowling M. J., Scanlon D. M. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? In Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry. 2004, No. 45 (1), pp. 2–40. DOI: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x.

60. Walley A. C., Metsala J. L., Garlock V. M. Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. In Reading and Writing. 2003, No. 16, pp. 5–20.

61. Wang H. C., Nickels L., Nation K., Castles A. Predictors of orthographic learning of regular and irregular words. In Scientific Studies of Reading. 2013, No. 17, pp. 369–384 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1088 8438.2012.749879 (accessed: 20.11.2019).

62. Witruk E. Assessment and treatment of dyslexia – an overview. In Ad verba Liberorum. 2012, No. 3 (1), pp. 4–18. DOI: 10.2478 / v10196-011-0022-1.


Review

For citations:


Zelenin A.V. Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, Inclusion: a Literature Review in the Research Field. Russian language at school. 2020;81(3):31-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-3-31-45

Views: 1970


ISSN 0131-6141 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0966 (Online)